Lots of luck on thin ice from Tokyo to Paris: Following the track of the preparedness and results of Emergency Medical Services and Disaster Medical Response during 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games from the Perspective of Academic Consortium (AC2020) of Japan and Medical Advisory Board of Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Summary Introduction The 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games (2020 Tokyo Olympics) was held in Japan during the pandemic of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in 2021. Preparedness In 2016, the Academic Consortium consisting of 29 major medical associations (AC2020) was launched and undertook medical risk assessment, issuing statements, and disseminating manuals/guidelines, training materials through its website. Administratively, Tokyo Organizing Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (TOC) was responsible for preparations inside the venue, while Tokyo Metropolitan Government (TMG) was responsible for preparations on the last mile and around the venue. In response to the AC2020 recommendation, the TOC and TMG has set up the subcommittee for reviewing emergency and disaster medical systems for the games. Finally, the 2020 Tokyo Olympics gave up accepting spectators from abroad and limited domestic spectators. The multi-organizational training was not systematically performed until just prior to the event due to the delay in deciding on the form of this big event. Results A total of 779,820 people participated during the entire period. The 316 patients were seen at hospitals including 53 COVID- 19 cases, and the patient presentation rate (PPR) was 2.4/1000. The COVID-19 cases in Japan increased as the games approached, and a major wave peak of the epidemic was observed during the games. Conclusion If MCI had occurred during the games, the current medical care system would not have been able to cope with such situation. We were walking on thin ice, but fortunately, we didn’t step out and drown in the water. Résumé Introduction Les Jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques de Tokyo 2020 (Jeux Olympiques de Tokyo 2020) ont eu lieu au Japon pendant la pandémie COVID-19 en 2021. Préparation En 2016, le Consortium Académique composé de 29 grandes associations médicales (AC2020) a été lancé et a entrepris une évaluation des risques médicaux, publié des mises aux points et diffusé des manuels/directives, du matériel de formation via son site Web. Sur le plan administratif, le comité d’organisation des Jeux olympiques et paralympiques de Tokyo (TOC) était responsable des préparatifs à l’intérieur du site, tandis que le gouvernement métropolitain de Tokyo (TMG) était responsable des préparatifs sur le dernier kilomètre et autour du site. En réponse à la recommandation AC2020, le COT et le TMG ont mis en place le sous-comité chargé d’examiner les dispositifs prévisionnels de secours pour les urgences et en cas de catastrophe pour les jeux. Enfin, les Jeux Olympiques de Tokyo 2020 ont renoncé à recevoir des spectateurs étrangers et ont limité les spectateurs nationaux. La formation multi-organisationnelle n’a été systématiquement effectuée que juste avant l’événement en raison du retard dans la décision sur la forme de ce grand événement. Résultats Au total, 779820 personnes ont participé pendant toute la période. Les 316 patients ont été vus dans les hôpitaux dont 53 cas de COVID-19, et le taux de présentation des patients (PPR) était de 2,4/1000. Les cas de COVID-19 au Japon ont augmenté à l’approche des jeux, et un pic de vague majeur de l’épidémie a été observé pendant les jeux. Conclusion Si un afflux de victimes s’était produit pendant les jeux, le système de soins médicaux actuel n’aurait pas été en mesure de faire face à une telle situation. Nous marchions sur de la glace mince, mais heureusement, nous n’avons pas dérapé et ne nous sommes pas noyés dans l’eau.

Medicine at mass gatherings: current progress of preparedness of emergency medical services and disaster medical response during 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games from the perspective of the Academic Consortium (AC2020).

Mass gatherings are events characterized by "the concentration of people at a specific location for a specific purpose over a set period of time that have the potential to strain the planning and response resources of the host country or community." Previous reports showed that, as a result of the concentration of people in the limited area, injury and illness occurred due to several factors. The response plan should aim to provide timely medical care to the patients and to reduce the burden on emergency hospitals, and to maintain a daily emergency medical services system for residents of the local area. Although a mass gathering event will place a significant burden on the local health-care system, it can provide the opportunity for long-term benefits of public health-care and improvement of daily medical service systems after the end of the event. The next Olympic and Paralympic Games will be held in Tokyo, during which mass gatherings will occur on a daily basis in the context of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic. The Academic Consortium on Emergency Medical Services and Disaster Medical Response Plan during the Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2020 (AC2020) was launched 2016, consisting of 28 academic societies in Japan, it has released statements based on assessments of medical risk and publishing guidelines and manuals on its website. This paper outlines the issues and countermeasures for emergency and disaster medical care related to the holding of this big event, focusing on the activities of the academic consortium.

JAAM nationwide survey on the response to the first wave of COVID-19 in Japan. Part II: how did medical institutions overcome the first wave and how should they prepare for the future?

Aim: To investigate and clarify the surge capacity of staff/equipment/space, and patient outcome in the first wave of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Japan. Methods: We analyzed questionnaire data from the end of May 2020 from 180 hospitals (total of 102,578 beds) with acute medical centers. Results: A total of 4,938 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were confirmed. Of 1,100 severe COVID-19 inpatients, 112 remained hospitalized and 138 died. There were 4,852 patients presumed to be severe COVID-19 patients who were confirmed later to be not infected. Twenty-seven hospitals (15% of 180 hospitals) converted their intensive care unit (ICU) to a unit for COVID-19 patients only, and 107 (59%) had to manage both severe COVID-19 patients and others in the same ICU. Restriction of ICU admission occurred in one of the former 27 hospitals and 21 of the latter 107 hospitals. Shortage of N95 masks was the most serious concern regarding personal protective equipment. As for issues that raised ICU bed occupancy, difficulty undertaking or progressing rehabilitation for severe patients (42%), and the improved patients (28%), long-lasting severely ill patients (36%), and unclear isolation criteria (34%) were mentioned. Many acute medicine physicians assisted regional governmental agencies, functioning as advisors and volunteer coordinators. Conclusion: The mortality rate of COVID-19 in this study was 4.1% of all hospitalized patients and 12.5% (one in eight) severe patients. The hospitals with dedicated COVID-19 ICUs accepted more patients with severe COVID-19 and had lower ICU admission restrictions, which could be helpful as a strategy in the next pandemic.

JAAM Nationwide Survey on the response to the first wave of COVID-19 in Japan. Part I: How to set up a treatment system in each hospital.

AIM: To clarify how the medical institutions overcame the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan and to discuss its impact on the medical labor force. METHODS: We analyzed questionnaire data from the end of May 2020 from 180 hospitals (102,578 beds) certified by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. RESULTS: Acute (emergency) medicine physicians treated severe COVID-19 patients in more than half of hospitals. Emergency medical teams consisted of acute medicine physicians and other specialists. Frontline acute care physicians were concerned about their risk of infection in 80% of hospitals, and experienced stress due to a lack of personal protective equipment. Twenty-six of the 143 hospitals that had a mental health check/consultation system in place indicated that there was a doctor who experienced mental health problems. Of the 37 hospitals without a system, only one hospital was aware of the presence of a doctor complaining of mental health problems. CONCLUSION: Acute care physicians and physicians in other departments experienced high levels of stress as they fought to arrange COVID-19 treatment teams and inpatient COVID-19 wards for infected patients. Medical materials and equipment may be sufficient for a second or third wave; however, active support is needed for the physical and mental care of medical staff. Mental health problems may be missed in facilities without mental check and consultation system.